The Power of Women In Spandex - Forums

no i am not making a statement with this photo that was taken before the high school shooting but clearly she is an nra member enjoying her assault type rifle hunting for deer in the woods i had to edit as her breasts were clearly visible as she uses them to attract deer and the high-capacity magazine is because shes a lousy shot she needs to fire off plenty rounds to catch one

evaee wrote:About 50% of all photos I process with a graphical editor - increase sharpness, brightness, reduce or increase the size of the photos. Tried many different programs and settled on XNView. But the monitor on my laptop is small and I suspect that sometimes I'm overdoing it. If the visitors of the site notice it, then let them point to me errors, it will help me to improve the quality of photos.

I agree that there are many Pictures that need some colour correction or white balancing. Even Pictures of professional photographers are sometimes overexposed. (But on the other hand this may be wanted by the artist.) This effect is surely increased by the many many photo sharing pages.

Nothing has been edited here:

I DO NOT edit ANY photos other than to blur out boosoms or part of intimate body part as i did with my last post friday-also the face of a young child; and i even mentioned it.
I found a 25+mb image hosting so i do NOT need to resize any photos to keep them under 10mb as before. On some very very rare exceptional occassions i may need to crop a photo. I promise you guys i have not used any editor to augment, sharpen, lighten-darken or in any way enhance a photo.
[i remember using a online contrast brighten or enhancer editor one time years ago and i did once post a photo that way but it took too much work/editing and never did any other photo] In fact i dont own or even bothered to download/purchase a photo editing tool on my computer.

Basically if its too blurry or too dark or too low pixel count i simply dont bother saving/posting it. Thats probably why my pics have much better resolution than evaee's. I stay clear of social sites that have low resolution pic camera photos. I use instagram but I prefer other sites. I am very selective as to what sources i pick....evaee gets his pics from what i understand sent to him so thats why his images need enhancing. 100% of everything i have posted and will ever post is off of the web directly. I have never bothered to ask to get pics sent to me to post. I will gladly reveal the source upon request of any foto to any member here; and over the years a number of you have inquired about a photo or a set of them and ive always been helpful---i post so many that i forget where i got it from but for the most part ive fullfilled your inquiries.

i do see and recognize evaee pics are 'real' as he calls it....i prefer/steer more to the pro photographer/staged ones....I am sure and glad that all of our forum members' tastes are met as we complement each other to cater to a diverse audience.

I take photos from the social network and plenty of photos out there done by non-professionals and therefore the quality is often not a good thing, but I do like the fact that they are from life, not staged (although there are staged). The main thing-their content and quality-again....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

davislove wrote:I DO NOT edit ANY photos other than to blur out boosoms or part of intimate body part as i did with my last post friday-also the face of a young child; and i even mentioned it.
I found a 25+mb image hosting so i do NOT need to resize any photos to keep them under 10mb as before. On some very very rare exceptional occassions i may need to crop a photo. I promise you guys i have not used any editor to augment, sharpen, lighten-darken or in any way enhance a photo.
[i remember using a online contrast brighten or enhancer editor one time years ago and i did once post a photo that way but it took too much work/editing and never did any other photo] In fact i dont own or even bothered to download/purchase a photo editing tool on my computer.

Basically if its too blurry or too dark or too low pixel count i simply dont bother saving/posting it. Thats probably why my pics have much better resolution than evaee's. I stay clear of social sites that have low resolution pic camera photos. I use instagram but I prefer other sites. I am very selective as to what sources i pick....evaee gets his pics from what i understand sent to him so thats why his images need enhancing. 100% of everything i have posted and will ever post is off of the web directly. I have never bothered to ask to get pics sent to me to post. I will gladly reveal the source upon request of any foto to any member here; and over the years a number of you have inquired about a photo or a set of them and ive always been helpful---i post so many that i forget where i got it from but for the most part ive fullfilled your inquiries.

i do see and recognize evaee pics are 'real' as he calls it....i prefer/steer more to the pro photographer/staged ones....I am sure and glad that all of our forum members' tastes are met as we complement each other to cater to a diverse audience.

evaee wrote:I take photos from the social network and plenty of photos out there done by non-professionals and therefore the quality is often not a good thing, but I do like the fact that they are from life, not staged (although there are staged). The main thing-their content and quality-again....

I agree to both of you!
I agree that professional Pictures are higher quality and higher resolution. i like it when you can see each wrinkle and each hair. But prof models tend to wear clumsy shoes or sneakers and prof models tend to use a little bit too much make up. Real Life photos show the real women, that are not wearing make-up. And as i said before, the women in eastern europe do wear more often slippers or perform bare feet. And thats what i like. Stirrup Leggings are rare. i have not often seen a prof model in stirrups (except fetish or porn models) that is wearing slippers while performing yoga. So like both kinds of posts. The top of it all would be a real-Life woman in Stirrups and Slippers in 4Megapixels or more.

Thanks Lycrafan its a matter of choice for our diverse audience [and i never look at their shoes to make a determination on saving/posting a photo or not-never have quite interesting that you do ].....when i 1st started/ventured posting way back to my early days on shinybods i searched more in the pro photos, back then pics were notorious for being poor quality as you know [computer pixels/storage/capacity was at a premium$$ and s-l-o-w dial-up connections made for low-pixel pics so they can download] and guys got their low-quality pics from posting boards...a vast majority of other members were posting those; i wanted to be different and avoided the posting blogs of the day; so i searched in the domain of smugmug and pro photographers/modeling formal website realm. And you can ask our present day moderator and any 'old-timers' here who remember me from way back to shinybods/z days; they can attest that my pics were always of higher resolution and that my stuff was a bit different and unique that i wasnt copying stuff from posting boards or other forums at all--i pioneered my own searches by bookmarking and checking out links. I just naturally gravitated to the 'pro' photos hi-quality modeling back then [model mayhem as an example was my number 2 aside from flikr]and to some extent i still do today. Evaee has a strong cult following and audience who prefer the natural pics. So we complement each other as i bring a different 'posed' set of pics that you dont easily find as well. With flikr as a base of search you can get both worlds. By the way i havent even used model mayhem as a search base in years; but i use many others which are easy to navigate.


mud runs and 'wet leggings' feature gals in a more natural unrehearsed no makeup state and i've specialized over the years on those photos:

davislove wrote:.... [and i never look at their shoes to make a determination on saving/posting a photo or not-never have quite interesting that you do ].....

i am a feetishist

I want to tell you a secret-many of the pictures I see for the first time, after sending them and sort them and this site just is tiring to sort them in categories - I hope that their friends have already prepared (they mark me-yoga, running, bike and I them these categories send....

I'm sorry, when you get just pictures of the most beautiful women in leggins, but a sin to throw them - the most important thing on this website - the beauty of women's legs